|This is the talk page for OICW.|
This page is reserved for discussion about the article itself, not for discussions about the subject.
Shouldnt it be stated that when in the white forest, A group of rebels are arguing over if the AR2 is real or not.Should i put that In the trivia.And HOW should i put it in terms that people would understand.--"I thought i would pretend i was one of those deaf-mutes (:p" 15:21, April 16, 2010 (UTC)
No,because the rebels were arguing first about AR3, and then that the one guy has fistfighted a Hunter.And if you didnt know,the OICW was the old AR2,but the design was changed to more Combine-like by using the Incendiary Rifle("combine flaregun") model and making it pulse-based. — Unsigned comment by 188.8.131.52
Esssentially an OSIPR?
"[...] essentially an OSIPR with a scope and a built-in grenade launcher instead of the energy ball thrower."
This just bugs me. "It's essentially an OSIPR, except for some major differences such as a grenade launcher, a scope, no energy ball thrower, conventional ammo instead of dark energy and the fact that it doesn't even look similar."
Is it okay if I change this a bit? Pete (talk) 19:25, 6 January 2017 (GMT)